Learning from Engineering Disasters: The Sinking of USS Thresher
In Learning from Engineering Disasters: The Sinking of USS Thresher, you'll learn ...
- The particulars of the sinking of USS Thresher
- How to practice a rigorous method for disaster analysis
- Vulnerabilities in developing an evolutionary design
- The value of multiple plausible theories in accident investigation
- Major cross-functional lessons learned from the USS Thresher disaster
Overview
On the morning of 10 April 1963, a support ship monitored a garbled communication from USS Thresher, the US Navy’s newest nuclear submarine, shortly before detecting the sounds of a submarine imploding under intense pressure. Over the next few days, it became apparent the submarine had sunk with all hands and crushed under the immense pressure applied as it passed below its design depth.
In its final communications, Thresher indicated that it was proceeding to test depth—the rated diving limit for the submarine. It then began to experience “minor problems” and attempted to surface. Two theories suggest that the “minor problem” might have been either a fitting failure, allowing the ship to fill with excess water and sink, or an electrical failure that shut down the propulsion systems, preventing the submarine from maintaining its depth. Both theories assert that this was exacerbated by a failure of an emergency surfacing system that was not upgraded when the new submarine design was developed.
The USS Thresher course refers to terms introduced in the “Learning from Engineering Disasters” course. Though not required, it is recommended that the learner consider completing the “Learning from Engineering Disasters” course prior to taking this course.
Learning Objectives
Upon completion of this course, participants will be able to:
- Describe the fundamentals of submarine design and operations
- Summarize the USS Thresher accident
- Compare the official theory of why the submarine sank with a plausible alternative theory
- Identify the major critical flaws and process flaws associated with the design and construction of the USS Thresher
- Explain how to investigate an engineering disaster when multiple failure theories develop
- Describe the use of alternative sources to determine the root cause when the accident site is inaccessible or the engineered system is completely destroyed
- Identify four common reasons why foresight does not prevent avoidable disasters
- Explain why investigative bias can hinder the exploration of multiple accident theories
- Describe how lessons learned from the accident were applied to USS Flasher while it was still under construction
- Explain the primary learning point of engineering disaster case studies such as the sinking of the USS Thresher
Certificate of Completion
You will be able to immediately print a certificate of completion after passing a multiple-choice quiz consisting of 20 questions. PDH credits are not awarded until the course is completed and quiz is passed.
| This course is applicable to professional engineers in: | ||
| Alabama (P.E.) | Alaska (P.E.) | Arkansas (P.E.) |
| Delaware (P.E.) | District of Columbia (P.E.) | Florida (P.E. Area of Practice) |
| Georgia (P.E.) | Idaho (P.E.) | Illinois (P.E.) |
| Illinois (S.E.) | Indiana (P.E.) | Iowa (P.E.) |
| Kansas (P.E.) | Kentucky (P.E.) | Louisiana (P.E.) |
| Maine (P.E.) | Maryland (P.E.) | Michigan (P.E.) |
| Minnesota (P.E.) | Mississippi (P.E.) | Missouri (P.E.) |
| Montana (P.E.) | Nebraska (P.E.) | Nevada (P.E.) |
| New Hampshire (P.E.) | New Jersey (P.E.) | New Mexico (P.E.) |
| New York (P.E.) | North Carolina (P.E.) | North Dakota (P.E.) |
| Ohio (P.E. Self-Paced) | Oklahoma (P.E.) | Oregon (P.E.) |
| Pennsylvania (P.E.) | South Carolina (P.E.) | South Dakota (P.E.) |
| Tennessee (P.E.) | Texas (P.E.) | Utah (P.E.) |
| Vermont (P.E.) | Virginia (P.E.) | West Virginia (P.E.) |
| Wisconsin (P.E.) | Wyoming (P.E.) | |



