Russell Ring |
Some questions lacked text to clarify the answers.
Karen Barrett |
Very good presentation of both ethics and the incident at Imperial Sugar.
Anthony Caputo |
the integration of code of ethics to this specific case provided good insight for us engineers.
Robert Reynolds |
Was a thought-provoking exercise. Enjoyed the process.
Nicholas Lyons |
The course provides a clear set up of the event and the relevant details that caused it. The evaluation and discussion of these circumstances in light of the ethical problems they highlight was easy to read and at times almost conversational. It was a good review of our ethical obligations.
Paul Vavonese |
The author did a good job of interweaving personal experience with the course content.
Donny Barton |
Good coverage but test focused on tiny details without enough measure of grasp of important principles.
John Luikey |
This was a well design course that delved into the root causes and the NOD that lead to the tragedy. It opened my eyes to how easily things can become the norm in everyday operations.
Arthur Loudon |
Very informative and well done. I also referenced the CSB video which was well done.
Marlo Carlson |
This course provided a good review of the tragedy that occurred at the Port Wentworth facility and the conditions that led up to it. The emphasis on the role and the responsibilities of the Professional Engineer, along with the review of the NSPE Code of Ethics provides an excellent reminder of the grave responsibilities we hold in that position.
Elliott Nir |
The course could have been briefer - if properly done, I think material could have been reduced to a 1 CEU course. I also think that the author sounded more than a bit sanctimonious in talking about his personal experience with a corrupt employer.
Jordan Buecker |
The course seemed to jump around quite a bit in terms of subject continuity but ultimately did a good job of driving home the critical need of code of ethics for Professional Engineers.